CAREGIVER -PATIENT RELATIONSHIP IN STROKE REHABILITATION UNITS
Ekstam, L., Johansson, U., Guidetti, S., Eriksson, G., & Ytterberg, C. (2015).
This review was developed as a result of a request from the Health Funding Authority (HFA) to produce an evidence-based report on the effectiveness of various tools in the implementation of services that cross the primary and secondary care interface. The tools of interest included case management, critical care pathways, practice guidelines and referral guidelines. For the purposes of this review primary care was defined as “first contact, continuous, comprehensive and coordinated care provided to individuals and populations undifferentiated by age, gender, disease or organ system.” It includes general practice, nursing, midwifery, health visiting, pharmacy, dentistry, optometry and the professions allied to medicine (physiotherapy, speech therapy, chiropody, dietetics and occupational therapy) (National Working Group on R&D in Primary Care, 1997). Secondary care was defined as surgical and medical services that are generally provided in a hospital setting. In many cases access to these services is by referral from a primary care health professional such as a general practitioner (Ministry of Health Performance Management Unit, 1998).The review subject of early discharge and the use of community support in the rehabilitation of stroke patients was chosen as an example of a chronic disease with an adequate research base. It was also of interest to the HFA since early discharge was a potential method of maintaining or improving quality of care and cost effectiveness. At the time of writing this report the HFA was funding a series of pilot programmers involving the use of integrated care. One of these pilots included the management of stroke in elderly patients. Therefore, it was thought this review would also be of interest to that group of providers.
Therefore, the primary objectives of this review were:
1. To critically evaluate the effectiveness of early discharge and family support in the management of patients following a stroke.
2. Through evaluation, what nursing interventions have been applied to improve the caregiver-patient relationship in stroke rehabilitation units?
1. How is the medical attendant patient relationship in stroke recovery units?
2. What nursing intercessions have been connected to enhance the medical attendant patient relationship in stroke rehabilitation units?
In a perfect world a randomized-controlled trial ought to be utilized and single result measures for particular measurements are valuable to stay away from deceptive relationship because of the utilization of various tests. The utilization of examiner blinding is additionally vital.
The exploration technique utilized as a part of this investigation is a qualitative approach. It was to outline past research writing on the medical attendant patient connections in stroke recovery units, looking for answers to the essayists’ examination questions. As significance of this postulation, efficient writing audit was utilized amid information gathering. Various advances were taken after to change over the examination inquiries into an exploration, and recognize current information with respect to pertinent ideas and settings. These included right off the bat, alluding back to the catchphrases, recognizing equivalent words, restricting the hunt by setting a criteria, and information extraction. Methodical surveys have dynamically been utilized as a foundation for strategy and medicinal services choices being that they offer a dependable, straightforward, clear and reproducible method for sorting out, assessing, breaking down and deciphering existing confirmation. ‘Methodical surveys have progressively supplanted customary story audits and master editorials as a method for outlining research confirm’ (Hemingway and Brereton 2009). It is looked into as a technique that has been utilized generally to aggregate up already examined writing concentrating on a specific research question. An efficient writing audit is directed in a way that recognizes, chooses, assesses and incorporates top notch inquire about confirmation appropriate to a given research question (Bettany-Saltikov 2012). It is likewise portray as a philosophy utilized for coordinating or looking at the outcomes or discoveries from different subjective investigations (Grant and Booth 2009). Efficient writing audit as an approach is invaluable in a way that; it coordinates up to-date and replicable data, settle discussion between clashing outcomes, gives solid premise to basic leadership and lessens deliberate mistakes of predisposition. They have a tendency to be more straightforward than story audit; in any case, they can be one-sided if the determination or accentuation of certain essential investigations is impacted by the assumptions of the creators or financing sources (Garg, Hackman and Tonelli 2008). Distribution inclination implies that positive outcomes have a tendency to be distributed in diaries more much of the time than negative outcomes (Bruce, Pope, and Stanistreet 2008). Five stages of leading a deliberate writing incorporate; right off the bat, confining the exploration question; furthermore, distinguishing the applicable distributions or writing; thirdly, surveying study quality; at that point outlining the confirmation from the examinations lastly, deciphering the discoveries (Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, and Antes 2003). A wide inquiry was performed taking a gander at a predetermined sort of studies and following a criteria decided at beginning. To accomplish significant and dependable information, it is fundamental to keep the pursuit as wide as conceivable on the grounds that not all exploration materials is distributed or accessible in database also, may not be effortlessly evaluated (Bruce et al. 2008). Making a wide inquiry offers access to more sources, as well as gives us access to the writing which was influenced by distribution predisposition. Efficient writing surveys are objective and straightforward. Their point is to keep away from inclination however much as could reasonably be expected. Scientists should utilize open strategies keeping in mind the end goal to think of solid discoveries by going for decreasing biasness.
Stroke restoration is the procedure by which a stroke survivor works with a group of medicinal services suppliers with the point of recapturing however much of the capacity lost after a stroke as could reasonably be expected. A blended techniques configuration was utilized consolidating writing audit, quantitative and subjective information and investigations .Data were basically gathered in the members’ homes. This exploratory study used a qualitative approach to gain an understanding of the family caregivers’ perceptions and experiences navigating the stroke rehabilitation system. This approach was selected as it provides a means of viewing an event through the eyes of the population being studied, as they experience it (Taylor, 1998; Gibb, 2002). Detailed descriptions of the experience are used to further our understanding, and ability to analyze the experience (Gibb). In order to understand the caregiving experience, the theory of continuity care was applied, in combination with a complex adaptive systems lens, to examine the transition home from hospital or stroke rehabilitation facility, and in some cases back to hospital.
The point of information extraction in this exploration is to assemble information from various sources and utilize them to answer the examination questions. It includes backpedaling to primary articles and featuring the pertinent data that will answer the exploration question. In any case, to institutionalize this procedure and enhance the legitimacy of the outcomes it was essential to aggregate an information extraction frame (The Cochrane Collaboration 2009). This stage is the most vital, testing and tedious part of the approach. So as to decrease predisposition, information extraction structures ought to be characterized and guided when the investigation convention is characterized. The point of this stage is to outline information extraction structures to precisely record the data analysts get from the essential examinations as illustratreted in the pie chart below.
Trend analysis for the increased severity of the obstructive hazard and the composite outcome of stroke
Extracted September, 2009
Limitations and recommendations
The major limitation of this study was to fully access articles. Most of the good articles were limited to access though other libraries were also visited. For that reason, the review might have missed out on very essential and relevant data. Shockingly, there is less research done on nurture persistent connections in stroke restoration. A large portion of the examination alluded to physiotherapists and methods for self-restoration. Others inclined more on characterizing stroke as a sickness. In spite of the considerable number of constraints, this examination is appropriate for per users who expect to get data about medical caretaker tolerant connections on stroke recovery units. In addition, the essayists picked up aptitudes of cooperation, learnt how to inquire about utilizing efficient writing survey and certainly additionally learnt how to design a research.
Recovery expects to augment action and cooperation and limit trouble for individuals with stroke and their families and careers. The physical and mental ability to partake in restoration controlled by individuals with stroke changes generally. A few people who are unwell will most likely be unable to take an interest by any means, though others might have the capacity to endure 6 hours of treatment daily. The potential long haul money saving advantages of even little changes in capacity might be critical. Proof proposes that expanding restoration power right on time after stroke brings about enhanced results, however the confirmation for this isn’t vigorous. Past examinations contrasting distinctive levels of force have utilized recovery inputs that are lower than the present levels suggested by the NICE stroke quality standard. In the event that it were demonstrated that expanding the power of recovery in individuals who can take an interest brings about practical and money saving advantages, stroke restoration administrations and financing taxes ought to be surveyed.
1. Andersson, Å & Hansebo, G. (2009). Elderly peoples’ experience of nursing care after a stroke: From a gender perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(10), pg. 2038–2045. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
2. Bartolucci, A ; Hillegass, W. (2010). Overview, Strengths, and limitations of systematic review and Meta-Analyses. Evidence-Based Practice: Toward Optimizing Clinical Outcomes. P 18-33. Berlin.
3. Barreca, S. ; Wilkins, S. 2008). Experiences of nurses working in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Journal of Advanced Nursing 63(1), pg. 36–44. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
4. Bettany-Saltikov J., (2012). How to do a systematic literature review in Nursing: A step-by-step guide. England: Mc Graw Hill.
5. Bronken, B. Kirkevold, M. Martinsen, R ; Kvigne, K. ( 2012). The Aphasic Storyteller: Coconstructing Stories to Promote Psychosocial Well-Being after Stroke. Qualitative Health Research. 22(10) 1303 – 1315.
6. Bruce, N. Pope, D. Stanistreet, D. (2008). Qualitative Methods for Health Research: A practical interactive guide to Epidemiology and statistics. First edition. Wiley. London.
7. Di Carlo, A. (2009). Human and economic burden of stroke: Age and Ageing; Vol. 38: pg. 4-5 Oxford university.
7. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., Kyngäs, H., (2009)Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness, Sage publications, University of Oulu, Finland.
8. Epstein, R. ; Street Jr, R. (2011). The Values and Value of Patient-Centered Care: Annals of family medicine. vol. 9 no 2, pg. 100 – 103. University of Rochester Medical Center.
9. Forchuk, J. Schofield, R. Sircelj, M ; Valledor, T. (2001). From hospital to community: Bridging therapeutic relationships: Journal of psychiatric and mental health Nursing. Volume 5, Pg 197 -202.
10. Garg, A. Hackman, D ; Tonelli, M. (2008). Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When one study is not enough. Vol. 3, no. 1 pg 253-260.